Skip to main content

ESPCLOCK4 - A Rethink On Tick Pulse Generation

Having dabbled recently with PWM (Pulse Width Modulation) for motor control, it struck me that maybe the same technique can be applied for pulsing the Lavet stepper motor in the analog clock.

Just a recap. The Lavet stepper motor within the analog clock is design to function at ~1.5V. However, the output on the ESP8266 and ESP32 is 3.3V, and in ESPCLOCK3, the ATtiny85 is powered at ~3V. For reasons I don't fully understand, the pulse width needs to be as long as 100ms in this case, otherwise the clock will not tick reliably. This also leads to high power draw, because higher voltage + longer pulse width. In contrast, the original clock signal is 32ms pulse width at ~1.5V (which can go as low as ~1.1V since it is running on a normal AA battery).

So in ESPCLOCK3, a diode bridge is introduced, where 2 diodes in each direction drops the 3V output by the ATtiny85 down to ~1.8V (3V - 0.6V x 2), which worked remarkably well in reducing the power draw and making the clock tick with 100% reliability.

Much like PWM in DC motor control, the idea is to eliminate the diode bridge and instead output a PWM modulated pulse signal, which should reduce the effective voltage to the clock.

With some experimentation, the ideal duty cycle of the PWM was found to be 62.5%. The output is 1.25ms on, 0.75ms off, repeated 20 times (for a total of 40ms). Both 62.5% and 40ms were found to be lower bounds for reliable operation.

The 62.5% duty cycle surprised me, because from my naive calculation, for an effective voltage of say, 1.5V, the duty cycle should be 1.5 / 3.3, which is 45%. 62.5% duty cycle implies an effective voltage of ~2V, which is much higher than I expected. I suspect my naive formula for calculating the duty cycle is wrong.

It was quite easy to modify the test program to output PWM pulses. This macro was added:

// Pulse given tickpin - 40ms duration = 20 x (1.25/2ms) PWM => 62.5% duty cycle ~ 2V
#define X_TICK_PIN(pin) \
    I_MOVI(R0, 20), \
  M_LABEL(_PULSE_##pin), \
    X_GPIO_SET(pin, 1), I_DELAY(10000), \
    X_GPIO_SET(pin, 0), I_DELAY(16000-10000), \
    I_SUBI(R0, R0, 1), \
    M_BGE(_PULSE_##pin, 1)

The macro is then used in the ticking logic:

    // Decide which pin to tick
    X_RTC_LOAD(TICK_PIN, R0),                           
    // Pulse tick pin 1
    // Pulse tick pin 2

I was pleasantly surprised this worked very well. It made the clock tick reliably without the diode bridge. Even better, this approach brought the power draw from 1.37mA down to 1.13mA, so it's a keeper!


  1. What would the code equivalent for X_TICK_PIN be if I want to drive the clock using PCA9685 via ESP32 ?

    1. Apologies, but I am not mighty familiar with the PCA9685. But it's just a standard PWN signal. As long as you can program it to output a PWN signal on one of its pins, you can play around with the duration and duty cycle of the signal. It doesn't take long to find the approximate duration/duty-cycle to use for a particular clock. It takes longer to home in on the right values for reliable operation. Sometimes slippages will occur after 10 or 20 minutes, so it is not sufficient to let the clock run for only a few minutes.

    2. Will try that next week. Was being lazy and trying to get the conversion of your X_TICK_PIN code to more standard PWM code :)


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Update: Line adapter for Ozito Blade Trimmer

Update (Dec 2021): If you access to a 3D printer, I would now recommend this solution , which makes it super easy to replace the trimmer line. I have been using it for a few months now with zero issue.

Attiny85 timer programming using Timer1

This Arduino sketch uses Timer1 to drive the LED blinker: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 /* * Program ATTiny85 to blink LED connected to PB1 at 1s interval. * Assumes ATTiny85 is running at 1MHz internal clock speed. */ #include <avr/io.h> #include <avr/wdt.h> #include <avr/sleep.h> #include <avr/interrupt.h> bool timer1 = false , led = true ; // Interrupt service routine for timer1 ISR(TIMER1_COMPA_vect) { timer1 = true ; } void setup() { // Setup output pins pinMode( 1 , OUTPUT); digitalWrite( 1 , led); set_sleep_mode(SLEEP_MODE_IDLE); // Setup timer1 to interrupt every second TCCR1 = 0 ; // Stop timer TCNT1 = 0 ; // Zero timer GTCCR = _BV(PSR1); // Reset prescaler OCR1A = 243 ; // T = prescaler / 1MHz = 0.004096s; OCR1A = (1s/T) - 1 = 243 OCR1C = 243 ; // Set to same value to reset timer1 to

3D Printer Filament Joiner

I have been looking at various ways of joining 3D printing filaments. One method involves running one end of a filament through a short PTFE tubing, melting it with a lighter or candle, retracting it back into the tubing and immediately plunging the filament to be fused into the tubing: One problem with this method is that you can't really control the temperature at which you melt the filament, so you frequently end up with a brittle joint that breaks upon the slightest bend. Aliexpress even sells a contraption that works along the same line. As it uses a lighter or candle as well, it suffers from the same weakness. I am not even sure why you need a special contraption when a short PTFE tubing will work just as well. Another method involves using shrink tubing/aluminium foil, and a heat gun: But a heat gun is rather expensive, so I wanted to explore other alternatives. The candle + PTFE tubing method actually works quite well when you happen to melt it at the rig